And in this headline we're gonna talk about a prison
guard, not a prisoner, a prison guard who is very
heavily pregnant, staring going through labor pains, and was denied
the ability to go to a hospital.
From the article, issa called for help and relief, but
her supervisor repeatedly refused her, even telling her that she
was lying.
Quote, you just want to go home.
When she finally had the ability to leave, she rushed
to a hospital only to go into emergency surgery where
the baby was delivered stillborn.
She is now assuming the state of Texas saying that
if only she got there earlier the baby would not
have died.
Which makes sense it's an unborn child previously had passed
viability and previously the heartbeat was detected.
But here in Texas we have a new attorney general
who basically said that this lawsuit was invalid because, quote,
Issa was only seeking to leave to care for herself,
not for the child, end quote.
This was a woman who was going through labor at
the time.
Further commentary from our Texas Attorney General says, quote, this
court need not weigh into difficult questions upon whether or
not the post-dobs decision means that an unborn child possesses
the constitutional right under the Fourteenth Amendment.
This is referring to the right of life.
This is the Texas Attorney General saying this.
A Republican, someone appointed by Governor Abbott.
And the Texas H.E.
goes further saying, quote, just because several statutes define an
individual to include an unborn child does not mean that
the Fourteenth Amendment does the same.
So just to put things in perspective here, here in
Texas, abortion is illegal, Roe v.
Wade is dead, but if the state puts you in
a situation where your baby winds up dying and then
you try to sue the state, the state will then
question whether or not the baby actually had any right
to life.